A drug-addled thug on the brink of (or in the throes of) an overdose died while in the custody of law enforcement. Was it murder? An accident? The family blamed the police; the officers involved claimed they’d done everything by the book.
The victim’s name was Alex Billmeyer. He was a white man from Dubuque, Iowa. The events occurred in 2019.
Police responding to calls of a woman overdosing in Gastonia, North Carolina, say that when they arrived she was inside her home with a gun. She was shot by police and died at the hospital. Her name was Shae Jones. She was a white woman from Gastonia, North Carolina, and was in the midst of a seizure. The events occurred this past February.
Both cases were investigated internally by state and/or local authorities. No charges have been filed in either case. There are others like them. Many others. Too many.
Americans wracked by drugs die in police custody with disturbing regularity. Americans are shot and killed by police with disturbing regularity. Americans of every color and creed.
The role of our justice system in such cases is to ensure that people are held accountable for wrongful deaths. Law enforcement officers are all human, they can be wicked and they can be careless, and their actions can cause deaths that never should have happened.
A drug-addled thug on the brink of (or in the throes of) an overdose died while being arrested. Was it murder? An accident? It looked bad: the officer was arrested and charged, and following a trial he was convicted yesterday by a jury.
Whatever you and I think about the case, that’s how the American justice system works. It did its job. As those of us with faith in the American justice system never doubted it could or would.
Derek Chauvin was found guilty on all three charges. He will likely appeal. It will then be the job of the appellate court to confirm or overturn each of the three verdicts. That’s how the system works.
But those of us with faith in the American justice system are apparently few and far between:
Analysis: Murder verdict in Floyd-case is historic. But whether it marks a major turning point in America’s racial history only time can tell, Michael Bjerre, Berlingske.dk, April 20
Analysis: Historic verdict in George Floyd case – but will it create real change in America?, Lillian Gjerulf Kretz, DR.dk, April 20
Blacks celebrate verdict on George Floyd’s murder, but the struggle for change in America’s race history is still long, Martin Burcharth, Information.dk, April 21
Officer convicted of killing George Floyd can get decades in prison, Sandra Brovall, Politiken.dk, April 21
America relieved after verdict, Jørgen Ullerup, Jyllands-Posten.dk, April 21
Berlingske and DR both call the verdict “historic” in their headlines.
It’s the first time ever in America that a white officer has been convicted for having caused a black man’s death in police custody, and in that sense the conviction represents a huge victory for the black America.
That’s very careful wording, and it’s by design: plenty of white officers have been convicted of killing black suspects unlawfully. (Here’s just one example.) It’s unlikely this was a first even using Bjerre’s convoluted formulation (I’d like to know his source), but it’s not impossible, for reasons DR actually gets right:
Historically speaking it’s rare that police are prosecuted, and rare that they’re found guilty. That picture changed in Minneapolis yesterday.
It is indeed rare that police are prosecuted for murder, and even rarer that they’re convicted. That’s true, and it’s a problem that goes beyond race.
To say “that picture changed in Minneapolis yesterday,” however, requires a logical leap of fantastic proportions. Snow in Denmark during the month of May is rare: if it snows next month, that will not change the rareness of May snows, it will merely make this May the most recent data point in the sequence. It would have to snow every May for the next few years before one could say the picture of May in Denmark was changing, wouldn’t it?
I’m one-hundred-percent in the bag for transparency and accountability in our law enforcement and justice systems. In all of our systems, including our elections. It’s our country, and we aren’t just entitled to know what’s going on, we need to know in order to live up to our own responsibilities as citizens. (We also need to remember that we have responsibilities, and that they’re serious.) I want to know that a cop will be held accountable for murder; I want cops to know that they’ll be held accountable for murder. I want to know that everyone who votes had their votes counted, and I want to know that only people with the right to vote did vote.
I would like to know why the Capitol officer who shot and killed the unarmed Ashli Babbitt has not only not been investigated or charged, but hasn’t even been named. I would like to know why the American media don’t seem interested in that particular case of a law enforcement officer shooting and killing an unarmed American. Their lack of interest is surely at least partly responsible for the government’s failure to release any information.
Maybe Lillian Kretz could ask? It would, after all, help to change the picture.
I would also like to know why when an officer saves the life of one girl by preventing her murder by another, we get headlines like:
Teenage Girl Is Fatally Shot by Police in Columbus, Officials Say (New York Times)
Ohio police fatally shoot black teenage girl just before Chauvin verdict (Washington Post)
Regardless: the protests have already started in Columbus.
As with the case of Derek Chauvin, there’s video of the event. Let Officer Tatum walk you through it if you can stomach it.
Once again: that’s just one video from one angle. We don’t know the whole story. But the systems of law enforcement and justice are reacting appropriately: the incident is being investigated as it should be, and we’ll see where it goes.
But while the video of Derek Chauvin looked bad to this layman’s eyes for Derek Chauvin, this video looks bad for Ma’Khia Bryant, the girl who was shot. Rushing at someone and raising a knife to slash at their throat is never a good look. (For a young man to kick a woman in the head while she’s prostate on the ground, in front of a police officer, isn’t a good look either, but that’s just a sideshow here.)
It appears to this layman’s eyes that the officer in this case saved the life of a black girl by neutralizing an assailant that was a second or two away from killing her. This layman has a hard time imagining what else the officer could have done to prevent that knife from making its mark.
This layman is also astonished, like Officer Tatum, that people would behave like this after police arrive on the scene. Any people of any color. Under any circumstances.
But go ahead and scan the headlines above again. Notice not a single one of them makes any reference to the fact that the officer fired his weapon to protect the life of an unarmed girl from an armed and very aggressive assailant.
Observe, also, that in the headlines it’s not one officer who fired the shot or shots that killed her, but “police,” “Ohio police,” and “Columbus police” (twice). See, that way it’s not just one officer: it’s systemic.
I have faith in our justice system.
I have none in our media.
Will that picture change?
News you can abuse
Going to the bar tomorrow? Here’s why the draft beer can hit a little harder than before
DR.dk, April 20
Sounds more like it went from bad to socialist
They stand in hour-long lines for bread and fear being arrested: The situation in Damascus has gone from bad to catastrophic
Berlingske.dk, April 21
You will dine out—or else
Reservations for restaurant and café visits are now mandatory
BT.dk, April 21
It’s all about the stars
The stars jubilant over historic verdict: “I cried tears of joy”
DR.dk, April 21
Green transition causes food prices to rise explosively
Jyllands-Posten.dk, April 21
It’s all about Bo and Leif
For four months Bo and Leif have been looking forward to visiting their favorite pub in Nørrebro – now they may
Berlingske.dk, April 21
“We don’t just want to steal your red meat, we want to change the world“
Politiken.dk, April 21
Come for the COVID-19, stay for the reopened bars and restaurants
As an American citizen, I receive various messages and alerts from the U.S. Embassy in Copenhagen, including information from the U.S. State Department. Today I received an email with the following text (links from the original):
The Department of State updated the Travel Advisory for Denmark from Level 3 (Reconsider Travel) to a Level 4 (Do Not Travel) on April 21. The advisory level for Denmark was changed because the Department of State has updated our Travel Advisories to better reflect and align with the scientific and statistical data that informs the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC’s) Travel Health Notices. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued a Level 4 Travel Health Notice for Denmark due to COVID-19, indicating a very high level of COVID-19 in country. As we improve our products to better keep U.S. citizens informed of the risks posed by COVID-19, many countries’ Travel Advisory levels will rise due to this change in methodology.
The text of the updated Travel Advisory for Denmark is below.
Current Travel Advisory for Denmark
Do not travel to Denmark due to COVID-19.
I already live in Denmark, obviously, but if I didn’t, and I were planning a visit, it certainly wouldn’t be due to COVID-19.